A few months ago, I attended to Search me: What’s happening to privacy on line? an event organized by Demos and hosted by Google at its London’s headquarters in Victoria.
The invited speakers were: Catherine Fieschi, Demos’ Director and also chair of the panel; Peter Fleischer, Google’s Global Privacy Counsel; William H. Dutton, director of the Oxford Internet Studies; and Bobbie Johnson, tech correspondent at The Guardian.
Here’s some random bits I found interesting and made me think about this issue:
- The “i” of the word privacy should sound like the “i” in ship and not like “eye”.
- In 2005, the DOJ requested for generic search records to several Internet Seach companies (Google, AOL, Yahoo, MSN). Google was the only one that said no and the DOJ asked a federal judge to order the company to give that information. The news came to public because of Google’s refusal.- According to research people tend to think that the Internet poses a much higher threat to privacy than CCTV cameras.
- Privacy isn’t a new issue: it’s been discussed since the 50s.
- There must be a balance between identification and privacy to prevent fraud and identity theft. Identification is important in sites like eBay where create a reputation plays an essencial role.
- It’s huge the metadata we leave behind everyday: credit/debit cards, public transport cards (Oyster), CCTV images, loyalty cards (Tesco, Nectar), mobile phone…
- We’re sleepwalking into a surveillance society and we don’t pretty much care about it.
- Monty, the cat that appeared in Google Street View, her owner had to ask Google for the image to be removed.
- In Sweden the website ratsit.se allows salary searches on any Swedish citizen.
- Systems should be able to forget information.
- We sign terms of agreement and privacy policies that we don’t actually read.
- Schools should play a role in educating kids about privacy. There are concerns about what information kids put these days in Facebook like sites.
- We’re underestimating kids. The new generations have a different view of privacy and can tailor it (choose who accesses their information). They’re learning quickly.
- We don’t know much about how data about us is being used and by whom.
- Every time we use a credit card that info flashes in 60 countries.
- The target advertisement campaigns based on criteria must respect privacy.
- The data we provide to companies (loyalty cards, loyalty credit cards) must give value. We give data and get value from it and that’s fine.
- GMail ads target only the email message. It’s effective and simple. There is no memory, no profile, no history.
- We have a bizarre relationship with privacy: we are concerned about privacy but will give it away for security, health, etc.
The talk was so much more interesting than this clumsy wrap up.
I left the building thinking Google takes the privacy issue very serious and it’s probably not the Big Brother we thing it is…
Was I totally brainwashed?! :)